Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2670 - 160 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 58 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €83.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |