Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 217 vs 202 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €126.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |