Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8845HS is 3748 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 153 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 45 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2670 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 8845HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
497
19.99195494770716%
Multi-Core
3408
29.20058264073344%
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
