Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 - 214 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€400.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €400.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |