Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500T outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500T is 1213 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2667 - 244 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |