Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 47% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2667 - 231 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €138.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |