Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 2039 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2665 - 133 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 91 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
