Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2665 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
488
32.817753866846%
Multi-Core
2940
63.78824039921892%
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |