Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2665 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2665 is 786 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 53 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
