Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i9-10900

Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i9-10900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop-Prozessor, 10 Kerne bis zu 5,2 GHz, LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipsatz) 65 W

Buy for 314.36 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 138 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop-Prozessor, 10 Kerne bis zu 5,2 GHz, LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipsatz) 65 W

Buy for 314.36 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 138 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900

  • Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2660 - 137 vs 115 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 65 vs 95 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 20 vs 16 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Xeon E5-2660 Logo
Xeon E5-2660

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


FPS

115

83%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

137

100%

Value, €/FPS

€2.29/FPS

100%

Price, €

€314.36

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop-Prozessor, 10 Kerne bis zu 5,2 GHz, LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipsatz) 65 W

Buy for 314.36 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 138 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Xeon E5-2660 Logo
Xeon E5-2660

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2660 Logo
Xeon E5-2660

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


Single-Core

442

25%

Multi-Core

2635

31%

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

8421

100%

Intel Xeon E5-2660 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2660

vs
Intel Core i9-10900 Logo

Intel Core i9-10900

Mar 6th, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5CollectionCore i9
Sandy Bridge-EPCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1200
Server
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
16Threads
20
2.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
3.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
95 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
22.0xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-2660 or Core i9-10900

Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.