Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 786 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2660 - 180 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
