Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 3748 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 8640U - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 60% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 245 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
17.445608380338438%
Multi-Core
3142
35.830767476337094%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
