Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2650 - 201 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€297.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €297.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |