Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 2409 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 125 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
