Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2508 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 192 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1236.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,236.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |