Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1825 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 45% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 109 vs 75 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |