Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7645HX is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
518
19.342793129200896%
Multi-Core
3208
27.230286053815465%
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
