Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2783 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 111% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2643 - 57 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 20 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |