Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 380 days older than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2640 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €62.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |