Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2401 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Xeon E5-2640 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 48 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |