Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1705 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G6950 - 125 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 73 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 90 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
