Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 90 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 277 vs 238 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€260.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €260.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |