Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 690 vs 670 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
