Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 41% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 171 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |