Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2501 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 193 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
