Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 567 vs 493 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
