Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 136 vs 124 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |