Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 35 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
41.88790560471977%
Multi-Core
2198
78.33214540270849%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
