Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 242 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 19% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 70 vs 59 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 54 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
40.92219020172911%
Multi-Core
2198
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 60 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
