Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 60 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 158 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |