Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 462 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2630 - 192 vs 190 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2630
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
