Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 205 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |