Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2620 - 268 vs 250 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€197.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €197.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |