Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 147 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €243.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
38.53516437786101%
Multi-Core
3996
32.366758464279926%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |