Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 644 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G1620 - 253 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
