Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 51% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 262 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
262
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€354.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €354.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |