Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 906 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 85 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 163 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |