Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 80% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 218 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€789
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |