Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 32 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€417.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
20.842490842490843%
Multi-Core
2519
14.629188686915617%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |