Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 85 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |