Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 123% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 58 vs 26 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
