Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 556 vs 507 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
FPS
556
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |