Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 132 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €109.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |