Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 546 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 124 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
No | Overclockable | No |