Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 214 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
