Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 2781 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 189 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€171.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €171.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |