Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v4 outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v4 is 1989 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-2400S - 481 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
452
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |