Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 24% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 285 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |