Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 835 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 529 vs 526 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
529
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
92.07221350078493%
Multi-Core
6726
90.2334317145157%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |