Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1713 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-4100 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
92.43697478991596%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |